# MoonPart Acceptance Report

Audit date: 2026-07-28  
Audit guide: `moonbitlang/skills` — `moonbit-agent-guide`  
Verified baseline: `2e06ff552411697538df52265df37e44528d6b53`

## Result

MoonPart passes the repository, documentation, license, example, build, test,
packaging, and continuous-integration checks that can be completed from the
public repository. Publication to mooncakes.io, Gitlink synchronization, and a
tagged GitHub release remain external completion steps.

## Requirement matrix

| Requirement | Status | Evidence |
| --- | --- | --- |
| MoonBit is the primary language | Pass | GitHub language data: MoonBit 78,417 of 79,043 classified bytes (99.2%) |
| Public repository | Pass | `https://github.com/Eisem/MoonPart`, default branch `master` |
| Clear README and usage | Pass | Purpose, API selection, examples, limits, scope, security, and development commands are documented |
| Runnable example | Pass | `moon run cmd/main` prints one decoded field and one streamed 9-byte file |
| Continuous integration | Pass | GitHub Actions run `30344161974` passed; the verified local baseline reproduces the same workflow |
| Build and checks | Pass | `moon check --target all` and `moon build --target all` |
| Runnable tests | Pass | 39/39 tests pass on wasm, wasm-gc, JavaScript, and native |
| Documentation tests | Pass | 4/4 `README.mbt.md` tests pass |
| Coverage | Pass | 649/733 instrumented points (88.5%); 62 source lines remain uncovered |
| Publishable package | Pass | `moon package --list` and `moon package` produce `eisem-moonpart-0.1.0.zip` |
| Published to mooncakes.io | Pending | `eisem/moonpart` is not published as of the audit date |
| Traceable development | Pass | 48 commits exist at the verified baseline; changelog and contribution workflow are present |
| Functional boundary | Pass | `README.mbt.md` and `docs/DESIGN.md` define responsibilities and non-goals |
| Open-source compliance | Pass | Apache-2.0 license; implementation is original; no third-party module dependency |
| Gitlink synchronization | Pending | The local repository has only the GitHub `origin` remote |
| Version release record | Pending | No public GitHub release existed at audit time |

## Ecosystem overlap check

The mooncakes.io public API returned 1,720 modules at audit time:

- exact module name `eisem/moonpart`: 0 matches;
- name, description, or keyword containing `multipart` or `form-data`: 0
  matches.

This supports the conclusion that MoonPart does not duplicate an existing
published multipart/form-data module. This check should be repeated immediately
before submission because the registry can change.

## Engineering observations

- The CI toolchain and core library are both pinned to
  `0.10.0+e66899a54`, preventing formatter and generated-interface drift.
- Public concrete API types are owned by the root package. Generated `.mbti`
  files are checked in CI.
- Streaming parser memory is bounded by configured limits and a
  possible-boundary suffix; file storage is delegated to application sinks.
- Streaming encoding preserves binary `PartData` and emits immediately writable
  chunks without retaining the complete outbound body.
- Sink failure is terminal, and callers retain responsibility for cleaning up
  partial external writes.
- The project contains 2,897 physical MoonBit lines and approximately 2,510
  nonblank, non-comment lines. This is below the competition's 4–10k reference
  range, although that range is described as guidance rather than a repository
  acceptance requirement.

## Remaining actions before final submission

1. Add and synchronize the required Gitlink remote.
2. Re-run the mooncakes.io overlap query.
3. Publish with the authenticated MoonBit toolchain and verify the generated
   package documentation page.
4. Tag `v0.1.0`, convert the changelog section into a dated release, and create
   a GitHub release.
5. Record at least one real Issue or pull request if the competition review
   expects community-process artifacts.
6. Expand the project with cohesive multipart functionality if the judges treat
   the 4–10k size guidance as a scoring threshold; do not add filler code.
